The thinking behind it.
| Principle | How it works | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Separate campaigns by brand | Distinct Aje, Aje Studio and Aje Athletica campaigns (search, shopping, Performance Max), each split by market | Each brand recruits its own customer at its own price point, instead of the cheapest-to-convert brand absorbing the budget |
| Target ROAS built on margin | Targets set from contribution margin by category within each brand, using product feed labels for margin bands | A $79 Studio tank and a $700 Aje gown can't share one blanket ROAS target without over-funding one and starving the other |
| Bid to customer lifetime value | Predicted lifetime value from the customer data platform fed back to Google and Meta, with higher value on new customers who look like Aje's best | Optimises for who she becomes, not just the first basket |
| Brand and non-brand kept apart | Branded search ring-fenced and tested for incrementality; non-brand and occasion terms funded for acquisition | Stops branded search flattering the numbers |
| One measurement view | Incrementality tests and a blended marketing efficiency ratio alongside platform ROAS | Shows what paid adds, not what it claims |
Google and Meta need different structures. On Google, intent differs by brand and category, so split campaigns and margin-based targets earn their place. On Meta, the opposite now holds: consolidate into fewer campaigns with broad targeting and one business objective, and let a deep pool of brand-specific creative (and lifetime-value signals from the customer data platform) find the right customer for each brand.